Theoretical Platform for Integrating the Defense-Industrial Complex into the National Economic System

Keywords: Defense-Industrial Complex, National Economy, Digital Twin, Logical-Linguistic Modeling, Dynamic Cognitive Scenario, Adaptive Management, Frame-Based Approach

Abstract

Purpose. To substantiate the theoretical platform for integrating the defense-industrial complex (DIC) into the national economic system through the implementation of intelligent management technologies, specifically digital twins and dynamic cognitive scenarios.

Method. The study employs methods of parametric systems theory, logical-linguistic modeling, a frame-based approach for knowledge representation, and systemic-situational analysis to classify management levels of complex national economy objects.

Findings. The concept of a "digital twin" of a DIC enterprise is formulated as a tool for proactive response to strategic challenges; a three-level structure of situational management (strategic, operational, executive) is developed; the use of frame models for structuring resource flows is proposed. The role of the Dynamic Cognitive Scenario as a backward logical inference tool for modeling alternative paths to goal achievement under resource constraints is identified.

Theoretical implications. The work deepens the parametric systems theory by distinguishing between attributive and relational concepts within the DIC context. The scientific novelty of applying logical-linguistic models (production, frame, semantic) to replicate the complexity of subject-object interaction in the defense sector is revealed.

Practical implications. The proposed models and tools (DCS, DSN, AMM) enable the automation of problem situation recognition at DIC enterprises, optimization of production schedules, and synchronization of industry resource complexes in real-time, which is critical for strengthening national resilience.

Originality. For the first time, an integrated approach to DIC management is proposed through an adaptive management mechanism that combines methods of mathematical linguistics and fuzzy logic to create a "bridge" between theoretical economic system parameters and the practical activities of state management bodies.

Research limitations. Limitations relate to the complexity of algorithmizing backward logical inference under highly dynamic legislation and the requirement for high-quality input data (Big Data) for the correct functioning of industrial digital twins.

Paper type. Theoretical-methodological / Research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brzoska, M. (2012). Smart Defense and the Future of European Defense Industrial Policy. IAI. https://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/iai_7.pdf

Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and Its Discontents. W. W. Norton & Company.

Gansler, J. S. (2011). Democracy's Arsenal: Creating a Twenty-First-Century Defense Industry. MIT Press.

European External Action Service. (2022). Strategic Compass for Security and Defence. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/strategic_compass_en3_web.pdf

U.S. Department of Defense. (2023). National Defense Industrial Strategy 2023. https://www.businessdefense.gov/NDIS.html

Heiets, V. M. (2018). Bariery na shliakhu rozvytku promyslovosti na innovatsiinii osnovi ta mozhlyvosti yikh podolannia [Barriers to industrial development on an innovative basis and ways to overcome them]. Economy of Ukraine, (1), 3–26.

President of Ukraine. (2021). Pro rishennia Rady natsionalnoi bezpeky i oborony Ukrainy vid 20 serpnia 2021 roku «Pro Stratehiiu rozvytku oboronno-promyslovoho kompleksu Ukrainy» [On the decision of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine dated August 20, 2021 "On the Strategy for the Development of the Defense-Industrial Complex of Ukraine"]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/372/2021


Abstract views: 89
PDF Downloads: 28
Published
2025-04-30
How to Cite
Koval, V. (2025). Theoretical Platform for Integrating the Defense-Industrial Complex into the National Economic System. Social Development and Security, 15(2), 379-388. https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2025.15.2.29
Section
Social Sciences