Counter-Terrorism Systems in the European Union in the Context of Contemporary Geopolitical Instability
Abstract
Purpose. To conduct a comprehensive study of counter-terrorism systems in the European Union by analysing their institutional, legal, and organisational mechanisms, assessing the effectiveness of existing approaches, and identifying the key challenges and issues in the field of security.
Method. The study employs systemic, institutional, comparative-legal, and structural-functional approaches. The research applies methods of analysis and synthesis of scientific literature, content analysis of EU legal acts and strategic documents, comparative analysis of the activities of security institutions, statistical analysis of data from Europol, ENISA, and other European organisations, as well as elements of scenario analysis to assess the prospects for the development of the EU counter-terrorism system.
Findings. The study analyses the contemporary architecture of the European Union's counter-terrorism system and identifies the roles of Europol, Eurojust, Frontex, the Schengen Information System, and other institutions in ensuring security. The main trends in the transformation of terrorist threats are identified, including the spread of digital radicalisation, cyberterrorism, and hybrid forms of confrontation. The study substantiates directions for improving interstate coordination, information sharing, the use of digital technologies, and the development of predictive response mechanisms to address contemporary security challenges.
Theoretical Implications. The research advances the scientific understanding of the functioning of the contemporary counter-terrorism architecture of the European Union, the patterns of transformation of terrorist threats, and the role of digital technologies in ensuring security under conditions of geopolitical instability.
Practical Implications. The findings may be used to improve public policy in the field of counter-terrorism, strengthen international security cooperation, harmonise Ukrainian legislation with European Union law, and develop proposals for enhancing cybersecurity, interagency coordination, and information exchange among competent authorities.
Paper Type. Theoretical and analytical.
Downloads
References
Bilan, I. A. (2021). Protydiia teroryzmu: dosvid YeS [Countering terrorism: The EU experience]. Informatsiia i pravo, 2(37), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.37750/2616-6798.2021.2(37).238338
Chernadchuk, T. O., & Berezovska, V. O. (2022). Polityka Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu shchodo borotby z teroryzmom: analiz zakonodavstva Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu ta deiakykh natsionalnykh antyterorystychnykh prohram [European Union policy on combating terrorism: Analysis of European Union legislation and selected national counter-terrorism programs]. Pravova derzhava, (48), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.18524/2411-2054.2022.48.267964
Krasii, M. O. (2025). Kryminalno-pravova polityka YeS u sferi borotby z teroryzmom [EU criminal law policy in the field of counter-terrorism]. Slovo Natsionalnoi shkoly suddiv Ukrainy, 2(51). https://doi.org/10.37566/2707-6849-2025-2(51)-15
Lipkan, V. A. (2000). Teroryzm i natsionalna bezpeka Ukrainy [Terrorism and national security of Ukraine]. Kyiv, Ukraine.
Winter, C., Neumann, P., Meleagrou-Hitchens, A., Ranstorp, M., Vidino, L., & Fürst, J. (2020). Online extremism: Research trends in internet activism, radicalization, and counter-strategies. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 14, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4119/ijcv-3809
Bures, O., & Gajo, C. (2026). Interoperability: A paradigm shift in EU counterterrorism? Studies in Conflict & Terrorism. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2026.2618982
Trauner, F. (2024). The impact of the Russian war against Ukraine on the reform of the common European asylum system. European Politics and Society, 25(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2024.2435401
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2003). Pro borotbu z teroryzmom: Zakon Ukrainy vid 20 bereznia 2003 roku № 638-IV [On combating terrorism: Law of Ukraine No. 638-IV of March 20, 2003]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/638-15
Council of the European Union. (2005). The EU counter-terrorism strategy. https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-14469-2005-REV-4/en/pdf
European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (2017). Directive (EU) 2017/541 of 15 March 2017 on combating terrorism. Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2017/541/oj
Europol. (2022–2024). EU terrorism situation and trend report (TE-SAT) 2022–2024. Publications Office of the European Union. https://www.europol.europa.eu/publications-events/main-reports/tesat-report
Institute for Economics & Peace. (2025). Global terrorism index 2025: Measuring the impact of terrorism. https://www.visionofhumanity.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Global-Terrorism-Index-2025.pdf
European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA). (2024). ENISA threat landscape 2024: July 2023 to June 2024. ENISA. https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/enisa-threat-landscape-2024
European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (2021). Regulation (EU) 2021/784 of 29 April 2021 on addressing the dissemination of terrorist content online. Official Journal of the European Union, L172, 79–109. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32021R0784
How the war in Ukraine has transformed the EU's common foreign and security policy. (2025). Yearbook of European Law, 44. https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yeaf003
Abstract views: 20 PDF Downloads: 19
Copyright (c) 2026 Сергій Євтух

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors agree with the following conditions:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (Download agreement) with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors have the right to complete individual additional agreements for the non-exclusive spreading of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, to post work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), with the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.
3. Journal’s politics allows and encourages the placement on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions, personal websites, SSRN, ResearchGate, MPRA, SSOAR, etc.) manuscript of the work by the authors, before and during the process of viewing it by this journal, because it can lead to a productive research discussion and positively affect the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).










