Wartime Defense Financing Architecture: Digital Transformation and Institutional Modernization in Ukraine
Abstract
Purpose. Substantiation of a conceptual model of the architecture of financial support for the state’s defence needs under the legal regime of martial law, integrating fiscal policy under conditions of extreme defence burden, digital transformation of procurement processes, and institutional modernization of the supply system of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
Method. Mixed methods paradigm combining quantitative analysis of empirical data with qualitative analysis of institutional transformations, including case study strategy, statistical analysis, comparative institutional analysis, content analysis of regulatory framework, structural-functional analysis, and bibliometric analysis of 38 Scopus publications for the period 2023–2026.
Practical implications. Substantiation of the effectiveness of specialized procurement agencies model with functional differentiation of lethal and non-lethal procurement, providing recommendations for implementing digital procurement platforms with 5–10 days delivery cycle instead of months, identifying effective mechanisms of public-private partnership in the defence innovation sector, creating a foundation for adapting Ukrainian institutional modernization experience by partner countries.
Value. Expanding theoretical understanding of institutional modernization possibilities under extreme conditions through the concept of “isomorphism under survival pressure”, filling gaps in research on defence financing systems functioning under extreme burden (34% of GDP), conceptualization of “Recovery under Fire” paradigm as an alternative to classical post-war reconstruction models, development of a three-level defence financing architecture model and six-dimensional institutional resilience model.
Paper type. Research.
Downloads
References
Anti-Corruption Action Centre. (2025, March). Why is Zelenskyi's Minister of Defence demolishing the defense procurement reform? https://antac.org.ua/en/news/why-is-zelenskyi-s-minister-of-defence-demolishing-the-defense-procurement-reform/
Aspeteg, J., Rehme, J., Gosling, J., & Holtström, J. (2025). Procurement for supply chain integration: Responding to complexity in engineer-to-order defence projects. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 45(13), 305–331. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-02-2025-0155
Ayan, M. A., & Çakır, S. (2025). Strategic foresight for emerging defense technologies: Impact on STI policies and diffusion timelines across short, medium, and long-term horizons. Futures and Foresight Science, 7(3), Article e70024. https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.70024
Babel. (2024, July 10). The State Rear Operator saved UAH 3 billion in the first quarter of 2024. https://babel.ua/en/news/105659-the-state-rear-operator-saved-uah-3-billion-in-the-first-quarter-of-2024
Bellais, R. (2024). The case for an alternative defence industrial policy. Defence and Peace Economics, 35(4), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2023.2240325
Brave1. (2025, April 29). Ministry of Digital Transformation and Brave1 launch defense technology marketplace for the military. https://brave1.gov.ua/en/ministry-of-digital-transformation-and-brave1-launch-defense-technology-marketplace-for-the-military/
Bukkvoll, T. (2025). Failures in Ukrainian arms procurement 2014–2023. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 58(1), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1525/cpcs.2024.2279103
Buras, P., & Umland, A. (2025, January). Ukraine's Defense Ministry needs protection—from itself. German Marshall Fund. https://www.gmfus.org/news/ukraines-defense-ministry-needs-protection-itself
Caverley, J. D., & Kapstein, E. B. (2025). The Atlantic Alliance: Diverging interests, converging policies. Survival, 67(6), 97–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2025.2588960
Centre for Economic Strategy. (2025). Ukraine War Economy Tracker. https://ces.org.ua/en/tracker-economy-during-the-war/
Chamnikul, C., & Khawne, A. (2025). Blockchain as a notarization system for military data sharing. In Proceedings of IEEE ICEAST 2025. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEAST64767.2025.11088155
Cherniavskyi, B., Cherniavska, T., Rusnak, A., Nadtochii, I., Nadtochii, V., & Nadtoshyi, A. (2025). Smart economy in the conditions of post-war recovery of Ukraine: Digital tools of remediation and their impact on regional development. In Ecological systems modeling (pp. 168–196). https://doi.org/10.21303/978-9908-9706-0-8.ch7
Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics and supply chain management (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. (2004). Aid, policy and growth in post-conflict societies. European Economic Review, 48(5), 1125–1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2003.11.005
Dani, M., & Menéndez, A. J. M. (2025). The EU's (not so) cheap talk on defence. European Law Open, 4(3), 425–440. https://doi.org/10.1017/elo.2025.10041
Defence Ukraine. (2025). Ukraine's defence procurement overhaul: A deep dive into transparency, domestic innovation, and wartime efficiency. https://www.defenceukraine.com/en/insights/ukraines-defence-procurement-overhaul
Dignitas. (2025, October 31). Building Ukraine's unmanned ground vehicles ecosystem. https://dignitas.fund/blog/building-ukraines-ugvs/
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Dimitri, N., Piga, G., & Spagnolo, G. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of procurement. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492556
Dunne, J. P., & Tian, N. (2015). Military expenditure, economic growth and heterogeneity. Defence and Peace Economics, 26(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2013.848575
European External Action Service. (2025, December). EU4UA Defence Tech: EU and Ukraine launch new €3.3 million BRAVE1 grant programme. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/delegations/ukraine/eu4ua-defence-tech-eu-and-ukraine-launch-new-€33-million-brave1-grant-programme_en
Fedorov, M. (2025, February 26). More than 200 companies in Ukraine involved in ground drone production. Militarnyi. https://militarnyi.com/en/news/more-than-200-companies-in-ukraine-involved-in-ground-drone-production/
Friton, P., & Trybus, M. (2023). Germany rearmed: The impact of the Ukraine war on German defence procurement law and policy. Public Procurement Law Review, 32(4), 215–238.
Genini, D. (2025). Restructuring the EU's defence industrial base amid geopolitical shifts. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 32(2), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X251394132
Ghazinoory, S., Mahdiani, R., & Fatemi, M. (2025). How to radically innovate in emerging defense ecosystems? Foresight and STI Governance, 19(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.17323/fstig.2025.26575
Glas, A. H., Essig, M., & Deimling, C. V. (2025). Defence supply markets: A secondary data analysis of buyer and supplier behaviour. European Procurement and Public Private Partnership Law Review, 20(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.21552/epppl/2025/1/12
Handayani, S., Hasnan, S., Ali, M. M., Mohd Kharuddin, K. A. M., & Harymawan, I. (2025). Unveiling corruption: Factors influencing procurement performance in Malaysian Federal Ministries. In Studies in systems, decision and control (Vol. 546, pp. 249–267). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65207-3_23
Hartley, K. (2011). The economics of defence policy: A new perspective. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203828809
Hellberg, R., & Lundmark, M. (2025). Transformation in European defence supply chains as Ukraine conflict fuels demand. Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies, 8(1), 17–39. https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.303
Hellberg, R., Sprängare, D., Candell, O., Carpenfelt, C., Lundberg, K., Samuelsson, P., Antai, I., Andersson, P., & Backlund, L. (2025). Performance constraints in defence industry supply chains: Evidence from case studies. Defence and Peace Economics, 36(8), 1078–1113. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2025.2500362
Herasymchuk, H., Zhuk, O., Holiachuk, N., Petruk, V., & Sytnyk, O. (2025). Implementation of digital solutions in the social sphere: Modern methods of program organization and development. Revista de Cercetare și Intervenție Socială, 90, 40–62. https://doi.org/10.33788/rcis.90.3
Hrazhdan, O. (2025, December 8). Ukrainian defense startups raise over $105M in 2025 – Brave1. Kyiv Post. https://www.kyivpost.com/post/65810
Hurochkina, V., Bondarenko, S., & Szapiro, T. (2025). The implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in the military domain: Opportunities and risks. In Proceedings of ACIT 2025 (pp. 965–974). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACIT65614.2025.11185755
Kananoja, L., Kosonen, J., Lehtonen, J.-M., & Lintunen, J. (2025). Delivering more competition to the EU defence markets? Examining the defence procurement directive, Directive 2009/81/EC. Defence and Peace Economics, 36(4), 423–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2025.2533753
Kelman, S. (1990). Procurement and public management: The fear of discretion and the quality of government performance. AEI Press.
Klomp, J. (2023). Political budget cycles in military expenditure: A meta-analysis. Economic Analysis and Policy, 77, 392–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.12.011
Kofman, M., & Fink, A. (2025, October 6). How and why Ukraine's military is going digital. Center for Strategic and International Studies. https://www.csis.org/analysis/how-and-why-ukraines-military-going-digital
Konrad, K. A., & Thum, M. (2024). Challenges of a new security situation for Germany – A public finance perspective. Wirtschaftsdienst, 104(8), 564–571. https://doi.org/10.2478/wd-2024-0173
Kovács, G., & Tatham, P. (2009). Responding to disruptions in the supply network: From dormant to action. Journal of Business Logistics, 30(2), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2009.tb00121.x
Kovalevskyy, S. (2025). Some aspects of the application of artificial intelligence for the recovery and development of Ukraine. In AI and digital transformation (pp. 311–342). Springer.
Krenn, F., Lampl, S., & Stary, C. (2025). Towards resilient digital supply chains. In Communications in computer and information science (pp. 213–228). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72041-3_15
Krpec, O., & Kříž, Z. (2025). Czech defence industry: Structural challenges of adaptation to modern wars and lessons from the Ukrainian conflict. Defence Studies, 25(2), 178–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2025.2452137
Maletova, O., & Utkina, M. (2025). Anti-corruption strategies in conflict settings: Ukraine's martial law experience in pursuit of the Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Peacebuilding and Development, 20(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/15423166251379573
Meershoek, N. (2025). EU law and military industries: Sovereignty and strategic autonomy in military procurement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003599807
Melnyk, L., Vasa, L., Kubatko, O., Koblianska, I., & Hrytsenko, P. (2025). Contribution of modern industrial revolutions to securing socio-economic systems during the war against Ukraine. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 23(2), 921–937. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(2).2025.67
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), Article 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
Ministry of Defence of Ukraine. (2025a, September). MoD's DOT saved over UAH 13.4 billion on procurement thanks to high competition. https://mod.gov.ua/
Ministry of Defence of Ukraine. (2025b, December 2). MoD reports: Over UAH 6 billion worth of equipment delivered to the military through DOT-Chain Defence. https://mod.gov.ua/en/news/mo-d-reports-over-uah-6-billion-worth-of-equipment-delivered-to-the-military-through-dot-chain-defence
Ministry of Defence of Ukraine. (2025c, December 27). $45 billion from partners, over 3 million strike drones, more Ukrainian weapons: Key Ministry of Defence highlights. https://mod.gov.ua/en/news/45-billion-from-partners-over-3-million-strike-drones-more-ukrainian-weapons-key-ministry-of-defence-highlights
Ministry of Defence of Ukraine. (2025d, July 3). MoD's procurement agencies strengthen anti-corruption and compliance infrastructure in line with NATO recommendations. https://mod.gov.ua/en/news/mo-d-s-procurement-agencies-strengthen-anti-corruption-and-compliance-infrastructure-in-line-with-nato-recommendations
Mombelli, S. (2024). Defense burden sharing and military cooperation in the EU27: A descriptive analysis (2002–2023). Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 30(4), 345–378. https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2024-0050
Mueller, T. (2025). Drivers and impact of European defence market integration: A literature meta-synthesis with economic focus. Defence and Peace Economics, 36(5), 577–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2024.2396416
NAKO. (2024). Як під час війни Україна реформує оборонні закупівлі [How Ukraine is reforming defense procurement during the war]. https://nako.org.ua/en/news/yak-pid-cas-viini-ukrayina-reformuje-oboronni-zakupivli
NATO. (2025, November 25). NATO and Ukraine announce new joint-initiative to accelerate defence innovation: UNITE – Brave NATO. https://www.nato.int/en/news-and-events/articles/news/2025/11/26/nato-and-ukraine-announce-new-joint-initiative-to-accelerate-defence-innovation-unite-brave-nato
Nazarova, K., Gordopolov, V., & Lositska, T. (2025). Intellectualization of financial investigations in the system of anti-corruption compliance of procurement in accordance with NATO standards in ensuring the stability of national security. Nuova Antologia Militare, 6(Special Issue), 83–106.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
O'Reilly, T. (2011). Government as a platform. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 6(1), 13–40. https://doi.org/10.1162/INOV_a_00056
OECD. (2025). OECD Economic Surveys: Ukraine 2025. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/940cee85-en
OSW Centre for Eastern Studies. (2025, January 30). Ukraine: The Defence Procurement Agency scandal. https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/analyses/2025-01-28/ukraine-defence-procurement-agency-scandal
Papapostolou, C., & Kanetaki, Z. (2026). Prospects and challenges of integrating digital technologies in the military supply chain. In Lecture notes in networks and systems (Vol. 892, pp. 234–256). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-10824-1_22
Pérez Morote, R., Ribeiro, H. N. R., Calleja-Lozano, J., & Santos-Peñalver, J. F. (2025). Risk and conditioning factors in the public internal control: Weaknesses in public management concerning the procurement of expenditure files. Public Money and Management, 45(5), 487–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2024.2390626
Pernica, B., Lasicová, J., & Kelemen, M. (2024). Corruption in armament procurement of small NATO countries: The case of Central European countries. Politické Vedy, 27(2), 60–83. https://doi.org/10.24040/politickevedy.2024.27.2.60-83
Petlenko, Y., Kharlamova, G., Giedraitis, V. R., Stavytskyy, A., & Ulvidiene, E. (2025). Exploring Scandinavian approaches to defense budget transparency in Ukraine: A theoretical review of opportunities and challenges. Public and Municipal Finance, 14(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.21511/pmf.14(1).2025.06
Petrukha, S., Petrukha, N., Konovalenko, D., Miakota, R., & Gubanov, V. (2025). Ukrainian state budget as a result of military actions in the Russian-Ukrainian war. International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Scope, 6(3), Article 04776. https://doi.org/10.47857/irjms.2025.v06i03.04776
Prathapan, S., Tanwar, S., & Prasad, M. S. (2025). Blockchain-based defence logistics network. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 3045, Article 020156). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0298322
Pyman, M., Wilson, R., & Scott, D. (2011). Building integrity and reducing corruption in defence and security: 20 practical reforms. Transparency International UK.
Sandler, T., & Hartley, K. (1995). The economics of defense. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511664496
Second Line of Defense. (2025, October 27). Ukraine's robot army: The rise of unmanned ground vehicles in modern warfare. https://sldinfo.com/2025/10/ukraines-robot-army-the-rise-of-unmanned-ground-vehicles-in-modern-warfare/
Sharp, T. (2026). Modest and balanced: The US defense budget buildup during the first Trump administration, 2017–2020. Defence and Peace Economics, 37(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2025.2477110
Shchepanskiy, E., Yemelyanov, V., Kopanchuk, V., Malanchii, M., & Hodlevskyi, S. (2025). Emerging threats to the state: Updating concepts and tools of response. Revista de Cercetare și Intervenție Socială, 91, 192–208. https://doi.org/10.33788/rcis.91.11
Singh, A., Kaushik, N., & Pandey, P. K. (2025). Building better defence: Overcoming challenges in product development through supplier integration in India. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 84(1), 82–98. https://doi.org/10.56042/jsir.v84i1.11901
SIPRI. (2025, April). Trends in world military expenditure, 2024 (SIPRI Fact Sheet). Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. https://doi.org/10.55163/AVEC8366
Stamouli, E., & Gasparinatou, M. (2025). Anti-corruption measures in Greece: Key issues and challenges. In A. Graycar (Ed.), Routledge handbook of anti-corruption (pp. 350–364). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003303275-24
State Operator for Non-Lethal Acquisition. (2025a). DOT-Chain Defence weapons marketplace has been assessed in accordance with the international NIST cybersecurity certificate. https://dotua.org/en/1752497612/
State Operator for Non-Lethal Acquisition. (2025b). A milestone in integrity: DOT becomes the first in Ukraine's defence sector to earn ISO 37001:2016 certification. https://dotua.org/
State Operator for Non-Lethal Acquisition. (2025c, July). Implementation of anti-corruption tools: Presentation at the National Agency on Corruption Prevention. https://dotua.org/
StateWatch. (2025, July 9). NATO-Ukraine Strategic Defence Procurement Review: StateWatch implementation monitoring April–June 2025. https://statewatch.org.ua/en/publications/nato-ukraine-strategic-defence-procurement-review-statewatch-implementation-monitoring-april-june-2025/
Tanklevska, N., Cherniavskyi, B., Zapsha, H., Borovik, L., Miroshnychenko, V., & Slobodyanyk, O. (2025). Implementation of blockchain technologies and smart contracts as a driver of international investment activity in the post-war recovery of Ukraine. In Ecological systems modeling (pp. 74–109). https://doi.org/10.21303/978-9908-9706-0-8.ch4
TechUkraine. (2025, April 24). Powering up innovation: Ukraine's Brave1 defense tech cluster reopens grant program. https://techukraine.org/2025/04/24/powering-up-innovation-ukraines-brave1-defense-tech-cluster-reopens-grant-program/
Thai, K. V. (2001). Public procurement re-examined. Journal of Public Procurement, 1(1), 9–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-01-01-2001-B001
The Defense Post. (2025, October 2). Ukraine's new defense marketplace hits 17,000 drone orders from frontlines in first two months. https://thedefensepost.com/2025/10/01/ukraine-frontline-drone-marketplace/
Torres, A. N. D., & Tapia, E. D. L. T. (2025). Cognitive bias in defense acquisition decision-making: Insights from the Armed Forces of the Philippines. Journal of Defense Analytics and Logistics, 9(2), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/JDAL-11-2024-0023
UNDP. (2025, February 25). Updated damage assessment finds $524 billion needed for recovery in Ukraine over next decade. United Nations Development Programme. https://www.undp.org/ukraine/press-releases/updated-damage-assessment-finds-524-billion-needed-recovery-ukraine-over-next-decade
Vasylchenko, M. (2025, December 8). Ukrainian company Tencore has delivered over 2,000 ground drones to troops in 2025. Ukrainska Pravda. https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2025/12/08/8010913/
Vdovichena, O., Krymska, A., Koroliuk, Y., Shymko, A., & Vdovichen, A. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence technologies in rebuilding the post-war economy and ensuring cyber security: An example from Ukraine. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología – Serie de Conferencias, 4, Article 642. https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2025642
Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
Wang, M. (2025). Misalignment of interests and threat perceptions: A dynamic study of NATO defense contributions. Defence and Peace Economics, 36(6), 678–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2025.2561008
World Bank, Government of Ukraine, European Commission, & United Nations. (2025, February 25). Ukraine – Fourth Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment (RDNA4): February 2022 – December 2024. World Bank Group. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2025/02/25/updated-ukraine-recovery-and-reconstruction-needs-assessment-released
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Zarembo, K., Knodt, M., & Kachel, J. (2025). Smartphone resilience: ICT in Ukrainian civic response to the Russian full-scale invasion. Media, War and Conflict, 18(3), 305–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352241236449
Abstract views: 172 PDF Downloads: 108
Copyright (c) 2026 Світлана Бондаренко, Микола Науменко

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors agree with the following conditions:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (Download agreement) with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors have the right to complete individual additional agreements for the non-exclusive spreading of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, to post work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), with the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.
3. Journal’s politics allows and encourages the placement on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions, personal websites, SSRN, ResearchGate, MPRA, SSOAR, etc.) manuscript of the work by the authors, before and during the process of viewing it by this journal, because it can lead to a productive research discussion and positively affect the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).












