New Approaches in Military Personnel Training: A Pedagogical Evaluation of Teaching Methods
Abstract
Purpose. The purpose is to scientifically analyze and evaluate the pedagogical effectiveness of new teaching methods applied in modern military personnel training.
Method. A comparison has been made between various pedagogical approaches, international military education practices, and the methods applied within the Azerbaijani military education system, and their effectiveness has been evaluated from both theoretical and practical perspectives.
Theoretical implications. The research revealed that the integration of modern teaching methods into military education significantly contributes to enhancing pedagogical quality in officer training. Problem-based learning, simulation, and interactive methods strengthen cadets’ analytical thinking, decision-making, and leadership skills. The systematic and continuous application of these approaches can ensure the development of the Azerbaijani military education system in alignment with international standards.
Practical implications. The implementation of problem-based learning models in military education institutions enables cadets to prepare for real combat scenarios. The use of simulation and technological training tools facilitates the practical development of decision-making, coordination, and operational planning skills. Organizing professional development programs for instructors on interactive teaching methods enhances the overall effectiveness of instruction. Integrating subjects that develop leadership and socio-emotional competencies into curricula strengthens cadets’ ability to work in teams and improves their psychological resilience. Reinforcing a student-centered approach within the teaching process increases cadet motivation and active engagement in learning.
Value. This article provides a scientific justification for the application of pedagogical innovations in the modern military education system and analyzes the practical impact of new teaching methods, identifying realistic and purposeful directions for aligning the development of Azerbaijan’s military education with international best practices.
Downloads
References
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
Dolmans, D. H., De Grave, W., Wolfhagen, I. H., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. (2005). Problem-based learning: Future challenges for educational practice and research. Medical Education, 39(7). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02205.x
NATO DEEP. (2021). Defence Education Enhancement Programme (DEEP): Annual Report. Available from : https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_139182.htm
Alexander, A. L., Brunyé, T., Sidman, J., & Weil, S. A. (2005). From gaming to training: A review of studies on fidelity, immersion, presence, and buy-in and their effects on transfer in PC-based simulations and games. DARWARS Training Impact Group. Available from : https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA457861.pdf
Salas, E., Bowers, C. A., & Rhodenizer, L. (2009). It is not how much you have but how you use it: Toward a rational use of simulation to support aviation training. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0803_2
Goleman, D. (2006). Social Intelligence: The New Science of Human Relationships. Bantam Books. Available from : https://danielgoleman.info/topics/social-intelligence/
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Available from : https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED336049.pdf
Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Azerbaijan. (2022). Official Reports on Educational Reforms. Available from : https://mod.gov.az
UNESCO IBE. (2017). Training Tools for Curriculum Development: A Resource Pack. Available from : https://www.ibe.unesco.org/en/resources/training-tools
OECD. (2020). The Impact of COVID-19 on Education: Insights from Education at a Glance 2020. Available from : https://www.oecd.org/education
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University (4th ed.). Open University Press. Available from : https://www.mheducation.co.uk/teaching-for-quality-learning-at-university-9780335242757-emea-group
Abstract views: 31 PDF Downloads: 14
Copyright (c) 2025 Mujkan Mammadzada
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors agree with the following conditions:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (Download agreement) with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors have the right to complete individual additional agreements for the non-exclusive spreading of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, to post work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), with the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.
3. Journal’s politics allows and encourages the placement on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions, personal websites, SSRN, ResearchGate, MPRA, SSOAR, etc.) manuscript of the work by the authors, before and during the process of viewing it by this journal, because it can lead to a productive research discussion and positively affect the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
