Military Operations for Law Enforcement.
Joint Operation of the Army Special Forces Command and the Police during the Nemangkawi Operation in Papua 2018
Abstract
Purpose. to analyze the strategy and tactics of the Indonesian Army Special Forces Command (Kopassus) within the Nemangkawi Task Force during joint operations with the National Police of Indonesia, focusing on counterinsurgency measures against the Papuan separatist armed group (KKSB).
Method. The research employs a qualitative approach based on a collective case study method. Data sources include official documents, academic publications, interviews with task force members, and analytical materials concerning the activities of KKSB. The analysis covers the three operational phases of the Nemangkawi Task Force (2018–2022).
Findings. The results demonstrate that KKSB posed a significant threat to Indonesian sovereignty by employing violent tactics such as killings, ambushes, hostage-taking, and propaganda about alleged human rights violations. Kopassus involvement initially improved operational effectiveness, though results declined as KKSB adapted its strategies. The dual nature of the operations—military and law enforcement—required high-level coordination between the army and the police. Weaknesses included limited trust from the local population, civilian casualties, and KKSB’s effective international propaganda efforts.
Practical implications. The findings can be applied to improve joint army–police counterinsurgency operations, design personnel training models to minimize losses, and strengthen information policies against separatist propaganda. This case may also serve as a practical model for military education institutions in Indonesia and other countries facing similar challenges.
Originality/value. The article provides one of the few comprehensive examinations of the Nemangkawi Operation as an example of hybrid military–law enforcement activity. It contributes to the understanding of counterinsurgency operations in Southeast Asia and offers new insights into the integration of military and police strategies in combating separatism.
Paper type. Applied nature.
Downloads
References
Damarjati, D. (2019). Benny Wenda's trail: Escape from prison, wanted by Interpol, live in England. Detik News.
Dhahir, D. F. (2019). Images of Indonesia in propaganda of Free Papua Movement: Case of attacks on civilians in Nduga Regency. Journal of Communication Research and Public Opinion, 23(3), 1–20.
Ervianto, T. (2019). Measuring the threat strength of KKSB-OPM (Part-1). Between Megapolitan.
Febrianti, S. W., Arum, A. S., & Dermawan, W. (2019). Resolution of the internal conflict between the Government of Indonesia and the separatism movement in Papua through the horse-trading mechanism. Journal of the Society, 7(2), 83–100.
Gumelar, I., & Nachrawi, G. (2022). Legal protection for TNI members under the human rights law: A case study of the Free Papua Movement separatist organization. Journal of Social Sciences and Education, 6(2), 4146–4166.
Hamid, M. F. bin A. (2018). Operation against insurgency by the Malaysian Army when facing the threat of the Malayan Communist Party in the Second Emergency (1968–1989) in order to achieve national security. Journal of Defense & National Defense, 1(1), 1–28.
Herlambang, A. (2020). The Papuan conflict (pp. 1–66). Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/
Ikhbal, A. M. (2021). TNI-Polri solid guard the land of Papua from the KKB through the Nemangkawi Task Force. INewsPapua.id.
Kominfo. (2019). Monthly hoax issue report for March 2019. Directorate of Information Technology Applications, Directorate General of Information Technology Applications.
Mhd, H. (2020). The implementation of Penta Helix counterinsurgency (COIN) strategic model in reconstructing special autonomy for Papua. Society, 8(1), 234–248. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v8i1.182
Mishael, G., Setiyono, J., & Hardiwinoto, S. (2016). Military operations policy of the Indonesian National Armed Forces against Free Papua Organizations in the perspective of international humanitarian law. Law and Justice, 5(41), 1–13.
Putra, P. M. S. (2017). Coordinating Minister for Political, Legal, and Security Affairs changes name of armed group in Papua to KKSB. Liputan6.com.
Republik Indonesia, Kementerian Pertahanan. (2015). Defense white paper.
Wibowo, E. Y., Hartono, & Purwanto, T. H. (2011). Determining attack paths in operations against insurgency in urban areas using remote sensing data and GIS. Indonesian Geography Magazine, 25(1), 15–24.
Yusvitasari, D. (2019). Analysis of the validity of an international treaty under international law: A case study of the Helsinki Agreement between GAM and Indonesia. Journal of Pancasila and Citizenship Education Communication Media, 1(2), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.23887/jmpppkn.v1i2.46
Abstract views: 28 PDF Downloads: 9
Copyright (c) 2025 Mhd Halkis, Ida Bagus, Y.S.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors agree with the following conditions:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (Download agreement) with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors have the right to complete individual additional agreements for the non-exclusive spreading of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, to post work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), with the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.
3. Journal’s politics allows and encourages the placement on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions, personal websites, SSRN, ResearchGate, MPRA, SSOAR, etc.) manuscript of the work by the authors, before and during the process of viewing it by this journal, because it can lead to a productive research discussion and positively affect the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).