Methodology for assessing the technical perfection of surveillance and mining sets
Abstract
Purpose: formalization of criteria for assessing the level of technical perfection of the KR, and development of a methodology for determining the most perfect.
Method: system analysis, comparison of formalization and assessment of expert data.
Research results: a method of assessing the level of technical perfection of the KR variant is proposed and a methodology is developed that allows for the assessment of the levels of technical perfection of several KR and their ranking. A method of performing an express analysis of the current level of technical perfection of the KR is proposed, with the modification of one or another parameter while preserving the estimates of the remaining parameters obtained as a result of the work of the expert group.
Theoretical implications: the method of assessing the level of technical perfection of the KR and determining their ranking will allow choosing the necessary KR option from the alternatives.
Papertype: descriptive and research.
Downloads
References
Gulyniysky L.F., Sergienko I.V. (1994). Refinement of the rules of choice in multiobjective decision-making problems using expert judgment // Systems Analysis, Modeling Simulation. no. 15. рр. 39–46.
Mikhalevich V.S., Volkovich V.L. (1982). Computational methods of research and design of complex systems. — Moscow: Nauka, 286 p.
Saaty T.L. (1990). Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytical Hierarchy Process. — NewYork: McGraw Hill, 502 p.
Saaty T.L. (1996). The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications. — Pittsburgh, 370 p.
Charnes A., Cooper W.W. (2001). Goal Programming and multiple Objective Optimization — Part 1 // European Journal of Operational Research. no 1. pp. 39–54.
Totsenko V.H. (1998). Evaluation of the comparative efficiency of alternatives of complex target programs by the method of hierarchical target modelin. Electronic modeling. Vol. 20. No. 3. рр. 76–90.
Totsenko V.H. (2001). About one approach to supporting decision-making in planning research and development. Part 2. Method of targeted dynamic evaluation of alternatives. Problems of management and informatics. No. 2. pp. 127–139.
Totsenko V.H. (1995). Generalized concept of expert diagnostic systems. Electronic modeling. No. 4. pp. 761–772.
Rosenberger R. S, Peterson G. L. (2002). Applying a Method of Paired Comparisons to Measure Economic Values for Multiple Goods Sets. J. of Agricultural & Applied Economics. no 34 (1). pp. 215–229.
Litvin I.N. (1999). Paired Comparisons in Science, Social Science, Economics and Health. Inaugural and Emeritus Addresses. — University of Port Elizabeth. pp. 1–36.
Totsenko V.G., Tsyganok V.V., (and others). (2002). Support for decision-making regarding the choice of the method of obtaining cardinal expert evaluations. Systemic research and information technologies. Kyiv, No. 4. рр. 52-53.
Korolev. V.M., Ageev O.V. (and other). (2023). Partial method of comparative evaluation of demining kit parameters. Collection of scientific works of the military institute of Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University. Kyiv, Vol. 79. рр. 26-34.
Korolev. V.M., Ageev O.V. (and other). (2021). A ballistic model of trawling explosive devices with a tension sensor of the target. Military and technical collection. Lviv, Vol. 25. рр. 34–37.
Korolev. V.M., Ageev O.V. (and other). (2023). Partial method of comparative evaluation of demining kit parameters. Collection of scientific works of Taras Shevchenko Military Institute of KNU. Kyiv, Vol. 79. рр. 26–34.
Lyashenko V. A., Kryvtsun V. I., (and others). (2023). A partial method of comparative evaluation of the level of technical perfection of samples of demining means (complexes). A collection of scientific works of the DNDI of the Academy of Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Cherkasy, Vol. 1(15). рр. 92–98.
Ageev O. V. (2023) Analysis of the status and directions of development of demining kits for the needs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Military and technical collection. Lviv, Vol. 28/2023. рр. 3–14.
Rusilo P.O., Kostyuk V.V., (and others). (2017). Selection of the level of technical excellence and technical characteristics of a prospective sample of weapons and military equipment (using the example of samples of armored repair and evacuation vehicles). Military and technical collection. HISTORY Lviv, 2017. Vol. 16. рр. 48-53.
Abstract views: 173 PDF Downloads: 133
Copyright (c) 2024 Volodymyr Korolov, Volodymyr Krivtsun, Olha Korolova, Oleksey Aheyev
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors agree with the following conditions:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (Download agreement) with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors have the right to complete individual additional agreements for the non-exclusive spreading of the journal’s published version of the work (for example, to post work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), with the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal.
3. Journal’s politics allows and encourages the placement on the Internet (for example, in the repositories of institutions, personal websites, SSRN, ResearchGate, MPRA, SSOAR, etc.) manuscript of the work by the authors, before and during the process of viewing it by this journal, because it can lead to a productive research discussion and positively affect the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
